All work
KPMGService DesignEmployee Experience Co-creationHR Transformation

Employee journey redesign: attrition as a service design problem

People were leaving KPMG, and leadership wanted to fix it. When I dug into the research, I found that the departure decision was being made much earlier than anyone realised, in specific, designable moments during onboarding and performance conversations. Attrition wasn't a people problem. It was a service design problem.

At a glance

Problem
Research showed that decisions to leave formed early, especially during onboarding and performance conversations.
My role
Led research across three career stages and designed service interventions for the moments that mattered most.
Key decision
Prioritise three research-backed touchpoints rather than attempting to redesign every stage of the employee journey at once.
Result
Delivered a buddy-system prototype, performance-coaching model, and change framework to leadership.
Company
KPMG Services
Role
Senior UX Designer, then Experience Design Lead
Duration
Jul 2018 to Apr 2020
Type
Service design, internal
My contribution
Research, service design & change framework
Delivery
Three priority touchpoints and intervention concepts delivered to leadership

Attrition isn't inevitable. It can be addressed from day one.

High attrition at a professional services firm is expensive, visible, and easy to misdiagnose. The instinct is to look at culture, compensation, or workload. What we found in the research was more specific, and more fixable. The decision to leave wasn't forming over months of general dissatisfaction. It was forming in specific, repeatable moments: the first week, when no one had time to help a new joiner; the performance conversation that felt like an evaluation rather than a coaching session; the recognition that never came after a difficult project.

These were service failures. And service failures can be redesigned.

The three critical touchpoints identified across the digital and human employee journey were Onboarding, Engagement and Recognition, and Offboarding. Each represented a moment where the firm's actions either aligned with employee expectations or fell short of them.

Three “How might we” questions that shaped the work

Onboarding
How might we ensure new joiners understand and integrate well into the firm within 3 months?
Performance management
How might we instil an effective performance management and coaching culture with frequent, quality conversations to establish meaningful goals?
Recognition
How might we ensure employees are acknowledged and recognised for their contribution in the most effective and motivating way?

Three career stages, three moments that decide whether people stay

Research was conducted across employee cohorts at different seniority levels and business units. The approach was designed to draw out honest answers in a professional services culture that favours composed, measured responses. We paid as much attention to what was left unsaid as to what was said.

The New Joiner
Graduate to early-career professional
The Mid-Career Professional
Manager to senior manager
The Senior Leader
Director to partner level
Context
Arriving with high expectations and forming lasting impressions in the first weeks
Managing client work, developing junior staff, and navigating their own career trajectory simultaneously
Accountable for practice performance and for the experience of the people they lead
Critical touchpoint
Onboarding. The quality of this experience shapes long-term loyalty and early performance
Performance conversations. These either build or erode trust in the firm over time
Retention conversations. By this stage, the experience has already determined whether people stay
Unmet need
Context, connection, and a sense of productivity from the very start
A manager who coaches rather than evaluates, and a clear view of what progression looks like
A culture and environment that enables high performance and reflects the firm's stated values
KPMG Employee Experience Journey: Transformation of HR Initiatives
Employee journey: the three critical touchpoints where belonging is built or eroded.

From ad hoc HR processes to a connected journey

Current stateTarget state
01

Onboarding varies across business units, with no consistent standard for how new joiners are welcomed and oriented.

01

A consistent onboarding pathway gives new joiners clear orientation, context, and early support.

02

Managers evaluate rather than coach, with infrequent, backward-looking performance conversations.

02

Employees own their development, supported by managers who coach with structured conversation guides.

03

Recognition is informal and inconsistent, dependent on individual managers rather than structured firm-wide mechanisms.

03

Recognition is structured, visible, and consistent across the firm.

04

New joiners lack a peer support structure in their first weeks, increasing the risk of early disengagement.

04

A buddy system connects new joiners with a peer from day one.

05

Employee experience is treated as a set of discrete HR processes rather than a connected end-to-end journey.

05

Employee experience is owned as a strategic design problem with ongoing research and iteration.

Research artefact: the original as-is journey map identified the broader employee lifecycle and the moments where intervention could have the most impact.
Employee journey map: current state from joining to departure, with critical touchpoints marked

Employee journey map: current state from joining to departure, with critical touchpoints marked

From research to service design solutions

01
Employee journey mapping
Mapped the three critical touchpoints (Onboarding, Engagement and Recognition, and Offboarding) and identified the moments of highest impact within each.
02
Qualitative research
In-depth interviews across seniority levels, designed to surface honest insight in a professional culture that does not naturally encourage candid disclosure.
03
Co-creation workshops
Facilitated workshops with senior leadership to walk through findings, surface assumptions, and build shared ownership of future-state solutions.
04
Service design
Designed specific solutions for onboarding (buddy system) and performance management (employee-led conversations with coaching guides) grounded in research insights.
05
Change framework
Developed a framework addressing Purpose, Outcomes, Conditions, and Behaviours so new practices would last beyond the project.

Designing for moments that build or break belonging

Two primary service design solutions emerged from the research and co-creation process.

The Buddy System addressed the onboarding gap. Being a new employee is both exciting and stressful. While managers play a critical role, a broader team effort is needed to make the first weeks positive and productive. The solution introduced a structured buddy programme, a peer connection designed to provide context, boost early productivity, and improve new-joiner satisfaction through a simple sequence of notifications, calendar invites, shared experiences, and a guided onboarding checklist.

The Performance Management redesign addressed the coaching gap. Employees need more frequent, focused, and future-oriented conversations, and a manager who acts as a coach rather than a boss. The design empowered employees to take ownership of their own development, supported by structured conversation guides that prepared managers to have quality check-ins with their mentees.

Tradeoff I made
I could have designed a comprehensive transformation of the entire employee journey. Instead, I recommended starting with three specific touchpoints where the research showed the highest impact, and explicitly deprioritised everything else. Senior leadership pushed back on the narrowness of the scope. My argument was that a focused intervention that actually stuck was worth more than a broad initiative that faded. The change sustainability framework was partly built to win that argument.

A change sustainability framework was developed to address the question that consistently arose during research: Will behaviours and business practices stick, or will people drift back to their old ways? The framework addressed Purpose, Outcomes, Conditions, and Behaviours, the four dimensions that determine whether change endures.

Buddy system and change framework: a focused onboarding intervention designed to last beyond the project.
Buddy system flow

A new joiner and their buddy receive connected prompts that make the first relationship easy to start.

  1. Buddy is notified that a new joiner has arrived.
  2. Buddy schedules a calendar invitation to meet.
  3. New joiner receives and accepts the invitation.
  4. They meet over complimentary drinks at the clubhouse.
  5. New joiner completes the guided onboarding checklist.
Service evidence
01 · Buddy prompt
Buddy receives new joiner notification

The buddy is prompted to welcome a new joiner.

02 · Joiner invite
New joiner receives calendar invitation

The new joiner receives a practical next step.

Performance coaching flow

Manager prompts and guidance make recurring, future-focused check-ins easier to prepare and sustain.

  1. Manager receives a timely check-in reminder.
  2. Manager schedules a check-in with their mentee.
  3. Manager prepares with the conversation guide.
  4. Manager leads the check-in using that guide.
  5. Goals and progress are recorded for follow-up.
Service evidence
01 · Check-in prompt
Manager receives performance check-in reminder

A timely prompt starts a regular performance conversation.

02 · Conversation guide
Manager receives conversation guide reminder

Preparation supports a more focused check-in.

Buddy system flow: new joiner integration within 3 months

Buddy system flow: new joiner integration within 3 months

Change sustainability framework: buddy, coaching model, recognition

Change sustainability framework: buddy, coaching model, recognition

What the work delivered

3
Critical touchpoints redesigned
✓
Buddy system designed and prototyped
✓
Performance coaching model delivered
✓
Change framework developed

The project delivered practical, research-grounded solutions to three of KPMG's highest-impact employee experience challenges. The approach reframed attrition as a design problem rather than an HR problem, one that could be addressed through thoughtful, human-centred intervention at the moments that matter most.

What I took from this
A focused intervention that sticks is worth more than a broad transformation that fades. Scope is a design decision too.

Future opportunities, not shipped scope

The KPMG EX project was human-centred, qualitative, organisational service design. But several of its core problems are now solvable with AI in ways that weren't practical in 2018–2020.

Opportunity
AI-assisted research synthesis across employee cohorts

Synthesising interviews across new joiners, mid-career professionals, and senior leaders was one of the most time-consuming parts of this project. AI could now speed up theme-finding and highlight where groups disagree about the same touchpoints.

Faster theme extraction // Cross-cohort pattern detection // Identifies contradictions between group narratives
Opportunity
Predictive attrition signals from engagement patterns

Research showed departure decisions formed early, in onboarding and performance conversations. AI watching signals such as buddy check-ins and conversation scheduling could flag risk sooner, which raises a critical question: who sees this data, and can employees opt out?

Early attrition risk surfacing // Manager intervention triggers // Data-driven retention decisions
Opportunity
AI coach prompts for performance conversations

Performance conversations felt like evaluations rather than coaching. AI could help managers prepare by surfacing recent work and open follow-ups from the last conversation, lowering the effort that leads them to deprioritise it.

Reduced preparation barrier // Consistent conversation quality // Continuity across conversations